BUZZ-Citi cuts Sodexo on 'long turnaround', flips preference to Compass with 'buy'

Reuters
5 hours ago
BUZZ-Citi cuts <a href="https://laohu8.com/S/SDXAY">Sodexo</a> on 'long turnaround', flips preference to Compass with 'buy'

** Citigroup downgrades Sodexo EXHO.PA to "neutral" from "buy", saying it will likely take a long time for the French food services firm to demonstrate its turnaround to investors

** "Investors will await definitive evidence of a recovery in our view," the broker says, noting the stock saw no market reaction from CEO change and catalysts for rerating are not imminent

** Citi prefers British rival Compass CPG.L, which it upgrades to "buy" from "neutral", citing its attractive valuation and sustainable growth

** The broker expects recent European M&A to lift Compass' international margins and sees a return to share buybacks in November 2026 as a further catalyst for the stock

** It maintains $Aramark(ARMK-W)$ ARMK.N and Elior ELIOR.PA at "buy", viewing Aramark as undervalued and noting Elior's dividend resumption provides a price floor

** Of 18 analysts that cover Sodexo, four rate it "strong buy" or "buy",​ 13 "hold" and one "sell" - LSEG data

** Fourteen out of 21 analysts rate Compass "strong buy" or "buy", with ​five at "hold" and two​ at "strong sell" or "sell" - LSEG data

(Reporting by Dimitri Rhodes)

((Dimitri.Rhodes@thomsonreuters.com;))

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10