Peter Schiff Says Gold Outperformed Bitcoin, Michael Saylor's Strategy Since Trump's Win — Here Is The Bigger Picture

Benzinga_recent_news
Yesterday

Bitcoin BTC/USD and its proxy stock Strategy Inc. MSTR have underperformed gold since President Donald Trump’s victory in November of last year, economist Peter Schiff highlighted on Tuesday.

In an X post, Schiff took the end of November as the reference point and highlighted the superior returns of gold and VanEck Gold Miners ETF GDX vis-à-vis Bitcoin investments.

While he did not specify a date, for the sake of this analysis, let us fix Nov. 30 as the reference. Clearly, the returns are similar to what he highlighted.

Schiff, a vocal gold advocate, has long been accused of cherry-picking time frames according to his convenience to downplay Bitcoin's returns.

Popular Bitcoin-focused X handle The ₿itcoin Therapist dared Schiff to zoom out and compare the returns over the last 10 years.

Notably, the apex cryptocurrency has soared 42,934% in this period, while gold has returned only 208%.

Moreover, if we compare the yearly performance, Bitcoin and MSTR have netted returns of 102% and 174%, respectively, compared to 41% for gold.

See Also: Michael Novogratz Says Bitcoin, Ethereum Treasury Frenzy May Be Over — What Now?

However, the assertions were not entirely unfounded. Bitcoin, which has been marketed as a safe-haven investment by its supporters, struggled earlier this year due to Trump’s sweeping tariffs and behaved like a risk-on asset.

Gold, on the other hand, held to its inflation hedge tag, rallying while stocks and cryptocurrencies tumbled. Year-to-date, spot gold rose nearly 27%, while Bitcoin has gained 20%.

As of this writing, the MSTR demonstrated a very high Momentum score. Visit Benzinga Edge Stock Rankings to see how it compares with the VanEck Gold Miners ETF.

Photo Courtesy: seven xu on Shutterstock.com

Read Next: 

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10