Gold Revaluation Won't Save U.S. Finances, Only 'Dresses Up the Books,' Says SocGen

Deep News
3 hours ago

Although central bank demand for gold has moderated in recent months, commodity analysts at Société Générale anticipate a resurgence in official sector gold purchases during the spring season.

In a recent precious metals report, the French bank examined the historical role of gold on central bank balance sheets, highlighting its fundamental differences from government debt and other reserve assets.

The analysts stated that gold will continue to play a significant role in global foreign exchange reserves. This analysis coincides with a milestone where global official gold holdings have surpassed U.S. Treasury holdings for the first time since 1996.

"Gold is not held as a tool for fiscal financing, but rather as a strategic reserve asset to support credibility, confidence, and currency resilience," the analysts said. "Gold's position on the central bank balance sheet is an anchor of trust—liquid, free of encumbrances, and without counterparty risk—not a pool of resources for short-term budget management to be monetized."

They added that gold's value lies in its immunity to short-term political pressures. "For these reasons, gold cannot be considered a reliable tool for debt reduction," the analysts wrote. "Its value lies precisely in being outside the realm of day-to-day policy decisions—serving as a final reserve to support confidence and stability in adverse scenarios, not as a stopgap for structural fiscal imbalances."

This report emerges as the function of gold on central bank balance sheets is undergoing renewed scrutiny, amid rapidly rising global sovereign debt and heightened geopolitical uncertainty. Société Générale stated that gold's enduring appeal is rooted in its unique monetary attributes. As sovereign debt burdens increase and confidence in fiat currencies faces periodic tests, central banks are unlikely to abandon what the bank describes as an "anchor of trust."

The bank also reviewed the increasingly politicized debate surrounding U.S. gold reserves. Calculated at current market prices, the U.S. debt-to-gold ratio is approximately 29 to 1, which analysts said is "not significantly out of line with other countries like... Japan and the U.K." However, because the U.S. continues to value its gold at the statutory price of $42 per ounce, this results in "about $3,484.5 of debt for every dollar of gold held," creating what the bank described as a "massive outlier in the debt-to-gold price ratio on the world stage."

The analysts also recalled the historical precedent from the Great Depression era, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt revalued gold from $20.67 to $35 per ounce. This move "immediately expanded the Treasury's gold-backed balance sheet" and devalued the dollar by approximately 41%, helping to loosen monetary conditions and combat deflationary pressures.

Fast-forwarding to the present debate, with U.S. federal debt now exceeding $38 trillion and the official gold price for accounting purposes still fixed at $42.22 per ounce—a level set in 1973—Société Générale noted that a revaluation of gold to around $5,000 per ounce would generate roughly $2.1 trillion in balance sheet gains. This would equate to approximately 5% to 6% of total U.S. debt.

However, the analysts stated that a mark-to-market revaluation would not resolve the U.S.'s fiscal challenges. They pointed out that even a gold price of $5,000 per ounce would "not solve the debt problem," but it could "buy time, improve fiscal appearances, and reset gold's position in the monetary system, albeit while signaling systemic stress."

Despite the recent softening in central bank demand, Société Générale suggested that the recent weakness in official sector buying appears temporary. While U.K. gold export data—often used as a proxy for central bank demand—indicated subdued activity in December, the bank expects a rebound.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10