Wedbush analyst Dan Ives has dubbed Palantir Technologies Inc PLTR the "Messi of AI"—a generational playmaker in the data game, with elite vision and impossible-to-replicate instincts. But even Lionel Messi, widely hailed as the GOAT, can get outpaced by a younger phenom. Enter Databricks, the $100 billion private-market rocket that looks a lot like Kylian Mbappé sprinting past a tired back line.
Citron Research put it bluntly: "Palantir is a $40 stock. This time, Databricks."
On paper, Palantir and Databricks sell similar promises: turn sprawling enterprise data into decisions with AI on top. In the box score, Databricks has the edge:
Read Also: Palantir Won Pentagon—Next Target: Fortune 500
Palantir's bulls cite a government-grade moat and profitable scale. Critics counter that Databricks' broader enterprise penetration and true SaaS model make it structurally faster.
Citron's math is stark: grant Palantir the same $100 billion tag Databricks commands, and you land at $40 per share—the same figure that surfaced when benchmarking Palantir against OpenAI. Once is a coincidence; twice starts to look like a pattern.
Ives' "Messi" metaphor still fits: Palantir is a magician in tight spaces, a proven winner with a cult following among CIOs and defense clients.
But Databricks has velocity—more logos, higher expansion, faster growth. For investors sculpting their personal ‘Mt. Rushmore of AI,’ the choice may be less about greatness than trajectory: the legend with field vision, or the sprinter rewriting the speed record.
Read Next:
Photo: Shutterstock
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.